First bad wikipedia experience
Rilkekind has a case of otitis media, so I read the wikipedia article. It's pretty good, but there is (at least at least currently) a tarantula on the angel food: a non-mocking section on homeopathic treatment. The sentence "One study showed" etc. is particularly misleadingly written. There has been some effort to ameliorate the section by adding a tincture of rationality but the right thing to do would be to just extirpate it.